QFRD vs VYM
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QFRD or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QFRD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 51 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +23.81%Best | +11.47% |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QFRD vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QFRD vs VYM Performance
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QFRD is up 23.81% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QFRD charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFRD currently yields 0.10% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
24.0% of QFRD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 17.9% of VYM's money is in holdings QFRD also owns.
QFRD and VYM share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 557 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 512 positions QFRD does not, 79.1% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 3.82%, XOM 2.63%, ABBV 1.80%, BAC 1.66%, UNH 1.52%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QFRD | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.25% | 7.35% | 6.10% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.45% | 2.51% | 1.06% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.25% | 1.31% | 0.94% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.36% | 1.86% | 0.50% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.18% | 0.63% | 1.55% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.64% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 1.76% | 0.54% | 1.22% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 2.03% | 0.14% | 1.89% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.48% | 0.66% | 0.82% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.14% | 0.73% | 0.41% |
24.0% of QFRD is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QFRD or VYM?
QFRD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QFRD and VYM?
24.0% of QFRD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 17.9% of VYM's is in holdings QFRD also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QFRD or VYM?
QFRD yields 0.10% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QFRD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.