IVV vs REET
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Global REIT ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | REET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.14% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $5.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.36% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 352 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +17.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +10.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +2.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -44.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 8, 2014 |
IVV vs REET Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while REET returned +17.80%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 14.19% for REET.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +10.55% for REET; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +2.79% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -44.6% for REET. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while REET charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $14 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.36% for REET.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and REET share 25 holdings out of 802 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or REET?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while REET charges 0.14%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or REET?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +17.80% for REET, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +2.44% for REET. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or REET?
REET has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs REET -44.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and REET?
IVV and REET have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and REET?
IVV and REET share 25 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 802 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or REET?
IVV yields 1.09% while REET yields 3.36%, so REET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.