IVV vs RGT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Royce Global Value Trust Inc.
Which is better, IVV or RGT?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RGT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.74% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $68M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 508 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +11.87% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +14.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27%Best | +20.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95%Best | +3.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5%Best | 20.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -46.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384Best | $11,655 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 18, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 9, 2013 to Sep 11, 2026 (12.9 years).
IVV vs RGT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RGT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Royce Global Value Trust Inc. (RGT) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while RGT returned +14.24%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 11.87% for RGT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.27% per year against +20.00% for RGT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +3.11% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.23% annualized vs +7.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 14.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -46.8% for RGT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RGT charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $174 annually, a gap of $171 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.07% for RGT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings RGT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RGT, our book for it covers 92.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in RGT, against full books of 508 and 103.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RGT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RGT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RGT charges 1.74%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $171 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RGT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +14.24% for RGT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +13.23% vs +7.21% for RGT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RGT?
RGT has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 14.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs RGT -46.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and RGT?
IVV and RGT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RGT?
IVV yields 1.06% while RGT yields 1.07%, so RGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.