RGT vs VYM
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RGT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $68M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +17.38% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.99% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.57% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.89% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2013 | Nov 10, 2006 |
RGT vs VYM Performance
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. (RGT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGT returned +25.99% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, RGT is up 17.38% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, RGT compounded at +22.57% per year against +19.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.89% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, RGT has the edge at +7.64% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for RGT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGT charges 1.74% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $4 annually, a gap of $170 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGT currently yields 1.09% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
RGT and VYM share 9 holdings out of 702 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGT or VYM?
RGT has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $170 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGT or VYM?
Over the past year RGT returned +25.99% vs +23.24% for VYM, so RGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RGT annualized +7.64% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGT or VYM?
RGT has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RGT -46.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both RGT and VYM?
RGT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RGT and VYM?
RGT and VYM share 9 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 702 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGT or VYM?
RGT yields 1.09% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.