RGT vs VYM
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RGT or VYM?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RGT led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $68M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 103 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +11.87% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.24% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.00%Best | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.11% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 13.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,655 | $17,758Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2013 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 9, 2013 to Sep 11, 2026 (12.9 years).
RGT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
RGT vs VYM Performance
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. (RGT) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGT returned +14.24% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, RGT is up 11.87% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, RGT compounded at +20.00% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.11% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.85% annualized vs +7.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 13.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for RGT and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGT charges 1.74% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $4 annually, a gap of $170 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGT currently yields 1.07% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of VYM's money is in holdings RGT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RGT, our book for it covers 92.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
13 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RGT and 603 in VYM, against full books of 103 and 613.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEICSei Investments Co. | 2.13% | 0.04% | 2.09% |
| HRBH&R Block, Inc. | 2.11% | 0.02% | 2.09% |
| EXPOExponent Inc | 1.84% | 0.01% | 1.83% |
| JKHYJack Henry & Associates Inc | 1.78% | 0.04% | 1.74% |
| KWRQuaker Chemical Corp. | 1.77% | 0.01% | 1.76% |
| IOSPInnospec Inc | 1.32% | 0.01% | 1.31% |
| VCTRVictory Receivables Corp | 1.32% | 0.01% | 1.31% |
| EVREvercore Inc | 1.06% | 0.05% | 1.01% |
| UFPIUniversal Forest Products Inc | 1.06% | 0.02% | 1.04% |
| NTBBank of N.t. Butterfield & Son Ltd | 0.98% | 0.01% | 0.97% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RGT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGT or VYM?
RGT has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $170 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RGT or VYM?
Over the past year RGT returned +14.24% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RGT annualized +7.21% vs +9.85% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RGT or VYM?
RGT has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 13.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RGT -46.8% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both RGT and VYM?
RGT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGT or VYM?
RGT yields 1.07% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RGT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RGT led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.