RGT vs VXUS
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. RGT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $68M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +16.85% | +13.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.72% | +24.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.20% | +20.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.63% | +9.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RGT vs VXUS Performance
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. (RGT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGT returned +24.72% while VXUS returned +24.30%. Year to date, RGT is up 16.85% versus a gain of 13.56% for VXUS.
Over three years, RGT compounded at +22.20% per year against +20.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.63% and +9.37% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, RGT has the edge at +7.61% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for RGT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGT charges 1.74% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $5 annually, a gap of $169 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGT currently yields 1.09% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RGT and VXUS share 31 holdings out of 7946 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGT or VXUS?
RGT has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $169 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGT or VXUS?
Over the past year RGT returned +24.72% vs +24.30% for VXUS, so RGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RGT annualized +7.61% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGT or VXUS?
RGT has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RGT -46.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RGT and VXUS?
RGT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RGT and VXUS?
RGT and VXUS share 31 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7946 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGT or VXUS?
RGT yields 1.09% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.