IVV vs RHTX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs RH Tactical Outlook ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RHTX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.51% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +9.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +18.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +14.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Adaptive ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 20, 2012 |
IVV vs RHTX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) is a ETF from Adaptive ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while RHTX returned +18.58%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 9.27% for RHTX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +14.88% for RHTX. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.4% for RHTX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.7% for RHTX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RHTX charges 1.51%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $151 annually, a gap of $148 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for RHTX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RHTX share 0 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RHTX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RHTX charges 1.51%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $148 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RHTX?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +18.58% for RHTX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +5.47% for RHTX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RHTX?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.4% for RHTX. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RHTX -24.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and RHTX?
IVV and RHTX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RHTX?
IVV and RHTX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RHTX?
IVV yields 1.09% while RHTX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.