IVV vs RMRC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF
Which is better, IVV or RMRC?
Large Cap Blend against Allocation/Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RMRC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.58% |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +1.98% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 94.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Armor ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 23, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs RMRC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs RMRC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) is an ETF from Armor ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 1.98% for RMRC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RMRC charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.58% for RMRC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 11 in RMRC, totalling 99.3% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 11 in RMRC, against full books of 508 and 12.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 11 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions RMRC does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RMRC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RMRC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RMRC charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RMRC?
IVV yields 1.06% while RMRC yields 0.58%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RMRC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.