IVV vs RONB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Baron First Principles ETF
Which is better, IVV or RONB?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RONB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | $876.4B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +14.15%Best | -3.96% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 77.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Baron Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 12, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs RONB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs RONB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) is an ETF from Baron Funds. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a loss of 3.96% for RONB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RONB charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for RONB.
Holdings Overlap
2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings RONB also owns. 30.0% of RONB's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
RONB and IVV share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 21 in RONB, against full books of 508 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for RONB that do not appear in our book for IVV (59.5% of the fund), and 474 for IVV that do not appear in RONB (96.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RONB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 8.72% | 7.16% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 0.27% | 4.22% | 3.95% |
| MSCIM S C I Inc. | 0.06% | 4.43% | 4.37% |
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 0.07% | 3.74% | 3.67% |
| FDSFactset Research Systems Inc. | 0.02% | 2.91% | 2.89% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 0.12% | 2.40% | 2.28% |
| ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd 5.450% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 1.76% |
| IDXXIdexx Labs | 0.07% | 1.75% | 1.68% |
30.0% of RONB is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RONB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RONB charges 1.00%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RONB?
30.0% of RONB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 30.0% of RONB's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 21 in RONB.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RONB?
IVV yields 1.06% while RONB yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RONB better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.