IVV vs ROSC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ROSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROSC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.34% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $62M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.80% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 309 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +20.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +30.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | +16.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | +10.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -46.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 23, 2015 |
IVV vs ROSC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while ROSC returned +30.63%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 20.50% for ROSC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.10% per year against +16.96% for ROSC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.40% and +10.00% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, ROSC has the edge at +8.25% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -46.3% for ROSC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROSC charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $34 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.80% for ROSC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ROSC share 1 holdings out of 806 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in ROSC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVA | 0.01% | 0.26% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROSC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROSC charges 0.34%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ROSC?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +30.63% for ROSC, so ROSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +8.25% for ROSC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROSC?
ROSC has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ROSC -46.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROSC?
IVV and ROSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROSC?
IVV and ROSC share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 806 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROSC?
IVV yields 1.10% while ROSC yields 1.80%, so ROSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.