ROSC vs VYM
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ROSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROSC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $62M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.80% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 309 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +20.83% | +15.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.99% | +23.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.93% | +19.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.86% | +12.19% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ROSC vs VYM Performance
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROSC returned +30.99% while VYM returned +23.95%. Year to date, ROSC is up 20.83% versus a gain of 15.84% for VYM.
Over three years, ROSC compounded at +16.93% per year against +19.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.86% and +12.19% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, ROSC has the edge at +8.28% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.3% for ROSC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROSC charges 0.34% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $4 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROSC currently yields 1.80% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ROSC and VYM share 81 holdings out of 824 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROSC or VYM?
ROSC has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROSC or VYM?
Over the past year ROSC returned +30.99% vs +23.95% for VYM, so ROSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ROSC annualized +8.28% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROSC or VYM?
ROSC has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ROSC -46.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ROSC and VYM?
ROSC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROSC and VYM?
ROSC and VYM share 81 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 824 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROSC or VYM?
ROSC yields 1.80% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.