IVV vs RSPG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Which is better, IVV or RSPG?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, RSPG over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSPG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $642M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +12.51% | +44.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +51.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27%Best | +15.90% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | +26.26%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 31.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -82.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384 | $32,087Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 48.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 1, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.8 years).
IVV vs RSPG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RSPG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while RSPG returned +51.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 44.28% for RSPG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.27% per year against +15.90% for RSPG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +26.26% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.42% annualized vs +5.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -82.1% for RSPG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSPG charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.82% for RSPG.
Holdings Overlap
3.1% of IVV's money is in holdings RSPG also owns. 95.5% of RSPG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RSPG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
21 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in RSPG, against full books of 508 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for RSPG that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.0% of the fund), and 475 for IVV that do not appear in RSPG (96.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RSPG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.94% | 4.62% | 3.68% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp. | 0.13% | 5.43% | 5.30% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 0.13% | 5.36% | 5.23% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.12% | 5.12% | 5.00% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.52% | 4.53% | 4.01% |
| TPLTexas Pacific Land Trust | 0.03% | 4.76% | 4.73% |
| CHKChesapeake Energy Corp | 0.03% | 4.75% | 4.72% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.11% | 4.62% | 4.51% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 0.21% | 4.44% | 4.23% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.13% | 4.47% | 4.34% |
95.5% of RSPG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSPG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSPG charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RSPG?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +51.78% for RSPG, so RSPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.42% vs +5.21% for RSPG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSPG?
RSPG has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RSPG -82.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSPG?
IVV and RSPG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSPG?
95.5% of RSPG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 95.5% of RSPG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in RSPG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSPG?
IVV yields 1.06% while RSPG yields 1.82%, so RSPG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSPG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, RSPG over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.