IVV vs RSPN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF
Which is better, IVV or RSPN?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, RSPN over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. RSPN is less concentrated, with 14.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSPN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.85% |
| Holdings | 508 | 83 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +3.86% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +7.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +15.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +10.38% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 19.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -61.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $16,385 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 1, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Sep 10, 2026 (19.8 years).
IVV vs RSPN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RSPN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while RSPN returned +7.63%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 3.86% for RSPN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +15.16% for RSPN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +10.38% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RSPN has the edge at +9.68% annualized vs +9.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -61.6% for RSPN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSPN charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.85% for RSPN.
Holdings Overlap
8.5% of IVV's money is in holdings RSPN also owns. 98.6% of RSPN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RSPN is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
81 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 83 in RSPN, against full books of 508 and 83.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for RSPN that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.4% of the fund), and 415 for IVV that do not appear in RSPN (90.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RSPN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.60% | 1.33% | 0.73% |
| RTXRaytheon Technologies Corp | 0.45% | 1.38% | 0.93% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.60% | 1.15% | 0.55% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.41% | 1.32% | 0.91% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 0.07% | 1.53% | 1.46% |
| BABoeing Co | 0.28% | 1.28% | 1.00% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.26% | 1.25% | 0.99% |
| UALUnited Airlines Holdings Inc. | 0.06% | 1.45% | 1.39% |
| SWKStanley Black & Decker Inc. | 0.02% | 1.49% | 1.47% |
| HWMHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.18% | 1.30% | 1.12% |
98.6% of RSPN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSPN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSPN charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RSPN?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +7.63% for RSPN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.38% vs +9.68% for RSPN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSPN?
RSPN has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RSPN -61.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSPN?
IVV and RSPN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSPN?
98.6% of RSPN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 98.6% of RSPN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 81 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 83 in RSPN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSPN?
IVV yields 1.06% while RSPN yields 0.85%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSPN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, RSPN over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. RSPN is less concentrated, with 14.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.