IVV vs RSPT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Which is better, IVV or RSPT?
RSPT has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RSPT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. RSPT is less concentrated, with 18.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSPT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $5.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 508 | 75 |
| YTD Return | +13.32% | +45.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.08% | +49.55%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.72% | +33.69%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.20% | +17.78%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 20.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -59.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,588 | $22,665Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 18.2%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 1, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Sep 23, 2026 (19.9 years).
IVV vs RSPT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RSPT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.08% while RSPT returned +49.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.32% versus a gain of 45.44% for RSPT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.72% per year against +33.69% for RSPT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.20% and +17.78% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RSPT has the edge at +14.19% annualized vs +9.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -59.0% for RSPT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSPT charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.25% for RSPT.
Holdings Overlap
37.6% of IVV's money is in holdings RSPT also owns. 98.5% of RSPT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RSPT is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
72 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 74 in RSPT, against full books of 508 and 75.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 74 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 410 positions RSPT does not, 61.0% of the fund.
Largest: AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%, GOOG 2.39%, META 1.90%, TSLA 1.56%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RSPT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 1.42% | 6.65% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 1.40% | 5.62% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 1.64% | 4.05% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 1.28% | 1.37% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.38% | 0.25% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 1.34% | 0.18% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 1.84% | 1.19% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.47% | 1.87% | 1.40% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 0.32% | 1.94% | 1.62% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.35% | 1.83% | 1.48% |
98.5% of RSPT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSPT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSPT charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RSPT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.08% vs +49.55% for RSPT, so RSPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.45% vs +14.19% for RSPT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSPT?
RSPT has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RSPT -59.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSPT?
IVV and RSPT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSPT?
98.5% of RSPT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 98.5% of RSPT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 72 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 74 in RSPT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSPT?
IVV yields 1.06% while RSPT yields 0.25%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSPT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RSPT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. RSPT is less concentrated, with 18.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.