IVV vs RVI

IVV vs RVI

Which is better, IVV or RVI?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRVI
Expense Ratio0.03%Best3.13%
AUM$896.5B-
Dividend Yield1.10%-
Holdings5082
YTD Return+10.99%Best+2.19%
1Y Return+11.30%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.62%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.79%-
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Robinhood Ventures
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 6, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

IVV vs RVI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs RVI Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) is an ETF from Robinhood Ventures. Year to date, IVV is up 10.99% versus a gain of 2.19% for RVI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RVI charges 3.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $313 annually, a gap of $310 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 2 in RVI, totalling 99.9% and 33.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, IVV as of Oct 1, 2026 and RVI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 2 in RVI, against full books of 508 and 2.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and RVI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVRVI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RVI?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RVI charges 3.13%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $310 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Is RVI better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.