IVV vs SCA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF
Which is better, IVV or SCA?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.07% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 9.69% |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +13.23% | +17.38%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.38% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.67% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.13% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 27, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs SCA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs SCA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Year to date, IVV is up 13.23% versus a gain of 17.38% for SCA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCA charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $107 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 9.69% for SCA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SCA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCA charges 1.07%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCA?
IVV yields 1.06% while SCA yields 9.69%, so SCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.