IVV vs SHPP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
Which is better, IVV or SHPP?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SHPP over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SHPP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.69% |
| Holdings | 508 | 122 |
| YTD Return | +13.86% | +17.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.57% | +26.05%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.48%Best | +12.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7%Best | 18.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -21.6% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $20,342Best | $15,536 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 8, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 9, 2022 to Sep 3, 2026 (4.2 years).
IVV vs SHPP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SHPP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% while SHPP returned +26.05%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.86% versus a gain of 17.74% for SHPP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.48% per year against +12.66% for SHPP. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +18.42% annualized vs +11.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -21.6% for SHPP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SHPP charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.69% for SHPP.
Holdings Overlap
1.0% of IVV's money is in holdings SHPP also owns. 34.8% of SHPP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 115 in SHPP, against full books of 508 and 122.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 21 positions for SHPP that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.3% of the fund), and 486 for IVV that do not appear in SHPP (98.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SHPP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.26% | 8.94% | 8.68% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 0.14% | 4.82% | 4.68% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.12% | 4.14% | 4.02% |
| NSCNorfolk Southern Corp | 0.12% | 3.89% | 3.77% |
| FDXFedex Corp | 0.10% | 3.80% | 3.70% |
| ROKRockwell Automation | 0.08% | 2.52% | 2.44% |
| ODFLOld Dominion Freig | 0.06% | 2.32% | 2.26% |
| JBHTJb Hunt Transport Services Inc. | 0.03% | 1.32% | 1.29% |
| EXPDExpeditors International Of Washington Inc | 0.04% | 1.21% | 1.17% |
| CHRWCH Robinson Worldwide | 0.03% | 0.93% | 0.90% |
34.8% of SHPP is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SHPP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SHPP charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SHPP?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% vs +26.05% for SHPP, so SHPP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +18.42% vs +11.06% for SHPP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SHPP?
SHPP has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SHPP -21.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SHPP?
IVV and SHPP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SHPP?
34.8% of SHPP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.8% of SHPP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 115 in SHPP.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SHPP?
IVV yields 1.10% while SHPP yields 1.69%, so SHPP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SHPP better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SHPP over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.