IVV vs SHRY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SHRY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.68% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +12.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +13.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +14.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +8.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -36.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 20, 2017 |
IVV vs SHRY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SHRY returned +13.58%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 12.26% for SHRY.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +14.61% for SHRY; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +8.95% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SHRY has the edge at +10.87% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHRY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -36.7% for SHRY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SHRY charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.68% for SHRY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SHRY share 46 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SHRY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SHRY charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SHRY?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +13.58% for SHRY, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +10.87% for SHRY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SHRY?
SHRY has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SHRY -36.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and SHRY?
IVV and SHRY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SHRY?
IVV and SHRY share 46 common holdings with a 12.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SHRY?
IVV yields 1.09% while SHRY yields 1.68%, so SHRY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.