IVV vs SIO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Touchstone Strategic Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $279M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.77% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 205 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +0.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +3.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +7.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 5.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -7.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Touchstone Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 21, 2022 |
IVV vs SIO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Touchstone Strategic Income ETF (SIO) is a ETF from Touchstone Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SIO returned +3.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 0.70% for SIO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +7.14% for SIO. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.7% for SIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -7.3% for SIO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SIO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.77% for SIO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SIO share 12 holdings out of 615 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SIO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SIO charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SIO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +3.90% for SIO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +5.90% for SIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SIO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.7% for SIO. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SIO -7.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and SIO?
IVV and SIO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SIO?
IVV and SIO share 12 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 615 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SIO?
IVV yields 1.09% while SIO yields 4.77%, so SIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.