IVV vs SLVP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Which is better, IVV or SLVP?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SLVP over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $978M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 508 | 48 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +15.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +62.91%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | +64.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | +25.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 42.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -80.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262 | $30,689Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 70.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 31, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2012 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.6 years).
IVV vs SLVP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SLVP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while SLVP returned +62.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 15.59% for SLVP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +64.29% for SLVP; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +25.14% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.28% annualized vs +4.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -80.6% for SLVP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SLVP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.77% for SLVP.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings SLVP also owns. 4.5% of SLVP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
SLVP and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 36 in SLVP, against full books of 508 and 48.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 4 positions for SLVP that do not appear in our book for IVV (16.8% of the fund), and 493 for IVV that do not appear in SLVP (99.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SLVP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SLVP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SLVP charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SLVP?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +62.91% for SLVP, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IVV annualized +13.28% vs +4.40% for SLVP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SLVP?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SLVP -80.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SLVP?
IVV and SLVP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SLVP?
4.5% of SLVP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.5% of SLVP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 36 in SLVP.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SLVP?
IVV yields 1.06% while SLVP yields 1.77%, so SLVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SLVP better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SLVP over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.