SCHD vs SLVP
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Which is better, SCHD or SLVP?
Large Cap Value against Mid Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over the full window, SLVP over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $112.2B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 2.28% |
| Holdings | 103 | 48 |
| YTD Return | +27.56%Best | +19.60% |
| 1Y Return | +30.29% | +81.06%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.37% | +65.75%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +25.33%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8%Best | 42.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -80.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,274 | $30,923Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 70.8% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jan 31, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2012 to Sep 4, 2026 (14.6 years).
SCHD vs SLVP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs SLVP Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +30.29% while SLVP returned +81.06%. Year to date, SCHD is up 27.56% versus a gain of 19.60% for SLVP.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.37% per year against +65.75% for SLVP; over five years the annualized figures are +10.23% and +25.33% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.23% annualized vs +4.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 13.8% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -80.6% for SLVP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SLVP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $39 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 2.28% for SLVP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 36 in SLVP, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 36 in SLVP, against full books of 103 and 48.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for SLVP that do not appear in our book for SCHD (21.3% of the fund), and 99 for SCHD that do not appear in SLVP (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and SLVP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SLVP?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SLVP charges 0.39%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or SLVP?
Over the past year SCHD returned +30.29% vs +81.06% for SLVP, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.23% vs +4.65% for SLVP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SLVP?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 13.8% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SLVP -80.6%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SLVP?
SCHD and SLVP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SLVP?
SCHD yields 3.13% while SLVP yields 2.28%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SLVP better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over the full window, SLVP over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.