SLVP vs VYM
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SLVP or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SLVP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $978M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 48 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.59%Best | +13.15% |
| 1Y Return | +62.91%Best | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +64.29%Best | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.14%Best | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -80.6% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $30,689Best | $17,750 |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.8% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2012 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.6 years).
SLVP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
SLVP vs VYM Performance
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVP returned +62.91% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, SLVP is up 15.59% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Over three years, SLVP compounded at +64.29% per year against +17.99% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +25.14% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +10.12% annualized vs +4.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 13.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.6% for SLVP and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVP charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVP currently yields 1.77% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
4.5% of SLVP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.4% of VYM's money is in holdings SLVP also owns.
SLVP and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SLVP and 603 in VYM, against full books of 48 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 567 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SLVP (97.1% of the fund), and 5 for SLVP that do not appear in VYM (16.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLVP | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 4.51% | 0.41% | 4.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLVP and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVP or VYM?
SLVP has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLVP or VYM?
Over the past year SLVP returned +62.91% vs +17.82% for VYM, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVP annualized +4.40% vs +10.12% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLVP or VYM?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 13.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SLVP -80.6% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both SLVP and VYM?
SLVP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVP and VYM?
4.5% of SLVP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.4% of VYM's is in holdings SLVP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SLVP and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVP or VYM?
SLVP yields 1.77% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SLVP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SLVP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.