SLVP vs VYM
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SLVP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVP | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $950M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +6.04% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +83.47% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.00% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.56% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SLVP vs VYM Performance
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVP returned +83.47% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, SLVP is up 6.04% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, SLVP compounded at +60.00% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +23.56% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.6% for SLVP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVP charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVP currently yields 2.28% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SLVP and VYM share 1 holdings out of 638 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLVP | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 4.51% | 0.41% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVP or VYM?
SLVP has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLVP or VYM?
Over the past year SLVP returned +83.47% vs +23.85% for VYM, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVP annualized +3.80% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLVP or VYM?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SLVP -80.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SLVP and VYM?
SLVP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVP and VYM?
SLVP and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 638 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVP or VYM?
SLVP yields 2.28% while VYM yields 2.24%, so SLVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.