IVV vs SLVX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nicholas Silver Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or SLVX?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 89.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SLVX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.16% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 13.35% |
| Holdings | 508 | 50 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | -12.96% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 89.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | XFunds |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 18, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs SLVX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs SLVX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nicholas Silver Income ETF (SLVX) is an ETF from XFunds. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a loss of 12.96% for SLVX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SLVX charges 1.16%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $116 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 13.35% for SLVX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 14 in SLVX, totalling 100.0% and 100.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 14 in SLVX, against full books of 508 and 50.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for SLVX that do not appear in our book for IVV (63.2% of the fund), and 497 for IVV that do not appear in SLVX (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SLVX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SLVX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SLVX charges 1.16%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $113 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SLVX?
IVV yields 1.10% while SLVX yields 13.35%, so SLVX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SLVX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 89.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.