IVV vs SMMV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Minimum Volatility Factor ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMMV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $292M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.65% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 369 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +10.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +13.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +13.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +6.49% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 7, 2016 |
IVV vs SMMV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Minimum Volatility Factor ETF (SMMV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while SMMV returned +13.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 10.75% for SMMV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +13.83% for SMMV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +6.49% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SMMV has the edge at +7.99% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.7% for SMMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.8% for SMMV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMMV charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.65% for SMMV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SMMV share 15 holdings out of 840 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMMV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMMV charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SMMV?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +13.16% for SMMV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +7.99% for SMMV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SMMV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.7% for SMMV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SMMV -38.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SMMV?
IVV and SMMV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMMV?
IVV and SMMV share 15 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 840 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMMV?
IVV yields 1.10% while SMMV yields 1.65%, so SMMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.