IVV vs SPC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.87% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $22M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.11% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 35 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +0.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | -8.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +2.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | CrossingBridge | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 20, 2021 |
IVV vs SPC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPC) is a ETF from CrossingBridge. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while SPC returned -8.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 0.26% for SPC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +2.13% for SPC. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +2.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.3% for SPC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.1% for SPC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SPC charges 0.87%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $87 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.11% for SPC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SPC share 0 holdings out of 537 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPC charges 0.87%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SPC?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs -8.55% for SPC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +2.67% for SPC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SPC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.3% for SPC. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SPC -16.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SPC?
IVV and SPC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SPC?
IVV and SPC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 537 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SPC?
IVV yields 1.09% while SPC yields 5.11%, so SPC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.