SPC vs VYM
CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.87% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $22M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.11% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +0.26% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -8.55% | +21.08% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.13% | +18.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | CrossingBridge | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SPC vs VYM Performance
CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPC) is a ETF from CrossingBridge and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPC returned -8.55% while VYM returned +21.08%. Year to date, SPC is up 0.26% versus a gain of 14.57% for VYM.
Over three years, SPC compounded at +2.13% per year against +18.16% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.99% annualized vs +2.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 7.3% for SPC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.1% for SPC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPC charges 0.87% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $4 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPC currently yields 5.11% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SPC and VYM share 0 holdings out of 635 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPC or VYM?
SPC has an expense ratio of 0.87% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPC or VYM?
Over the past year SPC returned -8.55% vs +21.08% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SPC annualized +2.67% vs +6.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPC or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 7.3% for SPC. Worst drawdown: SPC -16.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SPC and VYM?
SPC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPC and VYM?
SPC and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 635 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPC or VYM?
SPC yields 5.11% while VYM yields 2.24%, so SPC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.