IVV vs SPFF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
Which is better, IVV or SPFF?
Large Cap Blend against Preferred Stock.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $140M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 6.65% |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +12.24%Best | +4.28% |
| 1Y Return | +18.61%Best | +8.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98%Best | +8.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +1.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 9.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -50.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $10,783 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Preferred Stock |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 16, 2012 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2012 to Sep 9, 2026 (14.1 years).
IVV vs SPFF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs SPFF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while SPFF returned +8.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 4.28% for SPFF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +8.73% for SPFF; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +1.52% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs -0.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.3% for SPFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -50.1% for SPFF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SPFF charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $48 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 6.65% for SPFF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings SPFF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SPFF, our book for it covers 15.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 9 in SPFF, against full books of 508 and 51.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SPFF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPFF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPFF charges 0.48%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SPFF?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +8.44% for SPFF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IVV annualized +13.56% vs -0.82% for SPFF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SPFF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.3% for SPFF. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SPFF -50.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SPFF?
IVV and SPFF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SPFF?
IVV yields 1.06% while SPFF yields 6.65%, so SPFF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPFF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.