SPFF vs VXUS
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPFF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $145M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.62% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +4.49% | +14.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.27% | +25.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.91% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.69% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 16, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SPFF vs VXUS Performance
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPFF returned +10.27% while VXUS returned +25.32%. Year to date, SPFF is up 4.49% versus a gain of 14.33% for VXUS.
Over three years, SPFF compounded at +9.91% per year against +20.47% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.69% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.84% annualized vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.3% for SPFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for SPFF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPFF charges 0.48% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $5 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPFF currently yields 6.62% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SPFF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7878 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPFF or VXUS?
SPFF has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPFF or VXUS?
Over the past year SPFF returned +10.27% vs +25.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), SPFF annualized -0.81% vs +4.84% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPFF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.3% for SPFF. Worst drawdown: SPFF -50.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SPFF and VXUS?
SPFF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPFF and VXUS?
SPFF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7878 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPFF or VXUS?
SPFF yields 6.62% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so SPFF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.