IVV vs SRVR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
Which is better, IVV or SRVR?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SRVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $346M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.78% |
| Holdings | 508 | 76 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +5.01% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | -3.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +5.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51%Best | -3.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6%Best | 18.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -41.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,844Best | $8,235 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 71.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 15, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2018 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.3 years).
IVV vs SRVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SRVR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while SRVR returned -3.04%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 5.01% for SRVR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +5.41% for SRVR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.51% and -3.81% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.17% annualized vs +3.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 16.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -41.0% for SRVR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SRVR charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.78% for SRVR.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of IVV's money is in holdings SRVR also owns. 62.0% of SRVR's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 65 in SRVR, against full books of 508 and 76.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for SRVR that do not appear in our book for IVV (13.6% of the fund), and 473 for IVV that do not appear in SRVR (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SRVR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 0.10% | 16.25% | 16.15% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.16% | 15.99% | 15.83% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 0.12% | 15.14% | 15.02% |
| SBACSba Communications Corp. Class A Real Estate Investment Tru | 0.03% | 4.48% | 4.45% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 0.05% | 4.39% | 4.34% |
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 0.05% | 4.00% | 3.95% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.15% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.36% | 0.40% | 0.04% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.13% | 0.55% | 0.42% |
62.0% of SRVR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SRVR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SRVR charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SRVR?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -3.04% for SRVR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +14.17% vs +3.98% for SRVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SRVR?
SRVR has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 16.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SRVR -41.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and SRVR?
IVV and SRVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SRVR?
62.0% of SRVR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 62.0% of SRVR's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 65 in SRVR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SRVR?
IVV yields 1.06% while SRVR yields 2.78%, so SRVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SRVR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.