SCHD vs SRVR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
Which is better, SCHD or SRVR?
Large Cap Value against Mid Cap Growth.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SRVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $346M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 2.78% |
| Holdings | 103 | 76 |
| YTD Return | +23.46%Best | +5.01% |
| 1Y Return | +27.20%Best | -3.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.41%Best | +5.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.16%Best | -3.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3%Best | 18.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -41.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,223Best | $8,235 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8%Best | 71.4% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | May 15, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2018 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.3 years).
SCHD vs SRVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.3 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs SRVR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year SCHD returned +27.20% while SRVR returned -3.04%. Year to date, SCHD is up 23.46% versus a gain of 5.01% for SRVR.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.41% per year against +5.41% for SRVR; over five years the annualized figures are +10.16% and -3.81% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.49% annualized vs +3.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 16.3% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -41.0% for SRVR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SRVR charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $49 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 2.78% for SRVR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 65 in SRVR, totalling 100.0% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 65 in SRVR, against full books of 103 and 76.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 28 positions for SRVR that do not appear in our book for SCHD (75.6% of the fund), and 99 for SCHD that do not appear in SRVR (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and SRVR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SRVR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SRVR charges 0.49%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or SRVR?
Over the past year SCHD returned +27.20% vs -3.04% for SRVR, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SCHD annualized +11.49% vs +3.98% for SRVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SRVR?
SRVR has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 16.3% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SRVR -41.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SRVR?
SCHD and SRVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SRVR?
SCHD yields 3.00% while SRVR yields 2.78%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SRVR better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.