SRVR vs VXUS
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, SRVR or VXUS?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRVR | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $346M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 76 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +5.01% | +12.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.04% | +19.86%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.41% | +19.33%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.81% | +9.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.0% | -36.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,235 | $15,714Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2018 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.3 years).
SRVR vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.3 years both funds cover.
SRVR vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRVR returned -3.04% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, SRVR is up 5.01% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.
Over three years, SRVR compounded at +5.41% per year against +19.33% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -3.81% and +9.46% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +3.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 16.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.0% for SRVR and -36.0% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRVR charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRVR currently yields 2.78% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 20.2% of SRVR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
SRVR and VXUS share little of their money.
28 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in SRVR and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 76 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRVR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLNX:MACellnex Telecom Sa | 4.45% | 0.04% | 4.41% |
| NXT:AUNextdc Ltd. | 2.90% | 0.05% | 2.85% |
| 0788:HKChina Tower Corp H | 2.10% | 0.01% | 2.09% |
| RR:LNRolls Royce Holdings Plc Common Stock Gbp.2 | 1.10% | 0.38% | 0.72% |
| KEPE:SIKeppel Dc REIT | 1.33% | 0.01% | 1.32% |
| CNU:NZChorus Ltd | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.84% |
| CCO:CACameco Corporation Com Npv | 0.76% | 0.08% | 0.68% |
| HTWS:LNHelios Towers Plc | 0.81% | 0.01% | 0.80% |
| INW:MIInfrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA | 0.79% | 0.01% | 0.78% |
| 52690:KRKepco Engineering & Construction Co Inc | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
20.2% of SRVR is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRVR or VXUS?
SRVR has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRVR or VXUS?
Over the past year SRVR returned -3.04% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SRVR annualized +3.98% vs +7.07% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRVR or VXUS?
SRVR has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 16.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SRVR -41.0% vs VXUS -36.0%.
Should I hold both SRVR and VXUS?
SRVR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRVR and VXUS?
At least 20.2% of SRVR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in SRVR and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRVR or VXUS?
SRVR yields 2.78% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so SRVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than SRVR?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.