IVV vs SSXU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SSXU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.22% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $45M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.56% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 14 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +5.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +14.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +14.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Day Hagan Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 1, 2022 |
IVV vs SSXU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) is a ETF from Day Hagan Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while SSXU returned +14.66%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 5.44% for SSXU.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +14.06% for SSXU. Across the full 4-year window we track, SSXU has the edge at +11.91% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.6% for SSXU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.9% for SSXU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SSXU charges 1.22%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $122 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.56% for SSXU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SSXU share 0 holdings out of 524 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SSXU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SSXU charges 1.22%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $119 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SSXU?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +14.66% for SSXU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +11.91% for SSXU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SSXU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SSXU. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SSXU -13.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SSXU?
IVV and SSXU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SSXU?
IVV and SSXU share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 524 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SSXU?
IVV yields 1.10% while SSXU yields 2.56%, so SSXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.