IVV vs SSXU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF
Which is better, IVV or SSXU?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SSXU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.22% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $46M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.56% |
| Holdings | 508 | 20 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +4.69% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +9.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27%Best | +13.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 13.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -13.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $21,229Best | $15,826 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 77.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Day Hagan Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 1, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (4.2 years).
IVV vs SSXU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SSXU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) is an ETF from Day Hagan Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while SSXU returned +9.95%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 4.69% for SSXU.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.27% per year against +13.37% for SSXU. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +19.63% annualized vs +11.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 13.5% for SSXU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -13.9% for SSXU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SSXU charges 1.22%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $122 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.56% for SSXU.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 19 in SSXU, totalling 100.0% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 19 in SSXU, against full books of 508 and 20.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 19 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 495 positions SSXU does not, 99.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SSXU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SSXU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SSXU charges 1.22%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $119 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SSXU?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +9.95% for SSXU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +19.63% vs +11.55% for SSXU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SSXU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 13.5% for SSXU. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SSXU -13.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SSXU?
IVV and SSXU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SSXU?
IVV yields 1.06% while SSXU yields 2.56%, so SSXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SSXU better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.