SSXU vs VYM
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SSXU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.22% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $45M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +5.37% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.72% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.55% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Day Hagan Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SSXU vs VYM Performance
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) is a ETF from Day Hagan Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SSXU returned +14.72% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, SSXU is up 5.37% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, SSXU compounded at +13.55% per year against +19.03% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SSXU has the edge at +11.95% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.6% for SSXU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for SSXU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SSXU charges 1.22% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $122 vs $4 annually, a gap of $118 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSXU currently yields 2.56% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SSXU and VYM share 0 holdings out of 622 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SSXU or VYM?
SSXU has an expense ratio of 1.22% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $118 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SSXU or VYM?
Over the past year SSXU returned +14.72% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SSXU annualized +11.95% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SSXU or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SSXU. Worst drawdown: SSXU -13.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SSXU and VYM?
SSXU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SSXU and VYM?
SSXU and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 622 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SSXU or VYM?
SSXU yields 2.56% while VYM yields 2.24%, so SSXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.