IVV vs STEW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SRH Total Return Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STEW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 2.28% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $2.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.12% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +5.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +11.54% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +15.89% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +10.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -78.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Paralel Advisors LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 31, 2002 |
IVV vs STEW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SRH Total Return Fund (STEW) is a ETF from Paralel Advisors LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while STEW returned +11.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 5.98% for STEW.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +15.89% for STEW; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +10.12% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STEW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -78.2% for STEW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STEW charges 2.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $228 annually, a gap of $225 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.12% for STEW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and STEW share 12 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STEW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STEW charges 2.28%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $225 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or STEW?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +11.54% for STEW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +3.87% for STEW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or STEW?
STEW has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs STEW -78.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and STEW?
IVV and STEW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STEW?
IVV and STEW share 12 common holdings with a 9.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STEW?
IVV yields 1.09% while STEW yields 3.12%, so STEW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.