IVV vs SUPL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
Which is better, IVV or SUPL?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SUPL over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SUPL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.58% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 508 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +13.39% | +17.69%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.08% | +27.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +9.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 19.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9%Best | -24.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $18,207Best | $13,095 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 46.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 6, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (4.4 years).
IVV vs SUPL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SUPL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while SUPL returned +27.12%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 17.69% for SUPL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +9.16% for SUPL. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.59% annualized vs +6.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for IVV and -24.4% for SUPL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SUPL charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.51% for SUPL.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of IVV's money is in holdings SUPL also owns. 40.3% of SUPL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 40 in SUPL, against full books of 508 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for SUPL that do not appear in our book for IVV (11.3% of the fund), and 487 for IVV that do not appear in SUPL (98.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SUPL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.26% | 4.92% | 4.66% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 0.14% | 4.93% | 4.79% |
| NSCNorfolk Southern Corp | 0.12% | 4.93% | 4.81% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.12% | 4.50% | 4.38% |
| FDXFedex Corp | 0.10% | 4.25% | 4.15% |
| ODFLOld Dominion Freig | 0.06% | 4.03% | 3.97% |
| EXPDExpeditors International Of Washington Inc | 0.04% | 3.87% | 3.83% |
| JBHTJb Hunt Transport Services Inc. | 0.03% | 3.30% | 3.27% |
| CHRWCH Robinson Worldwide | 0.03% | 2.95% | 2.92% |
| FDXFFedex Freight Holding Company Inc | 0.02% | 2.61% | 2.59% |
40.3% of SUPL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SUPL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SUPL charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SUPL?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +27.12% for SUPL, so SUPL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +14.59% vs +6.32% for SUPL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SUPL?
SUPL has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -19.9% vs SUPL -24.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and SUPL?
IVV and SUPL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SUPL?
40.3% of SUPL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 40.3% of SUPL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 40 in SUPL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SUPL?
IVV yields 1.10% while SUPL yields 2.51%, so SUPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SUPL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SUPL over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.