IVV vs SUPL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SUPL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SUPL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.51% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +19.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +28.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +9.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 20.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 6, 2022 |
IVV vs SUPL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while SUPL returned +28.66%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 19.70% for SUPL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +9.24% for SUPL. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.4% for SUPL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SUPL charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.51% for SUPL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SUPL share 10 holdings out of 535 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SUPL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SUPL charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SUPL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +28.66% for SUPL, so SUPL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +6.82% for SUPL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SUPL?
SUPL has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SUPL -24.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and SUPL?
IVV and SUPL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SUPL?
IVV and SUPL share 10 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 535 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SUPL?
IVV yields 1.10% while SUPL yields 2.51%, so SUPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.