SUPL vs VYM
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SUPL or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SUPL led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SUPL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 40 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.31%Best | +13.15% |
| 1Y Return | +25.19%Best | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.74% | +17.99%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $12,816 | $16,195Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.4% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.4 years).
SUPL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
SUPL vs VYM Performance
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SUPL returned +25.19% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, SUPL is up 15.31% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Over three years, SUPL compounded at +8.74% per year against +17.99% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +11.58% annualized vs +5.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for SUPL and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SUPL charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SUPL currently yields 2.51% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
25.1% of SUPL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.8% of VYM's money is in holdings SUPL also owns.
SUPL and VYM share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in SUPL and 603 in VYM, against full books of 40 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 561 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SUPL (95.7% of the fund), and 11 for SUPL that do not appear in VYM (26.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SUPL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 4.92% | 0.67% | 4.25% |
| NSCNorfolk Southern Corp. | 4.93% | 0.29% | 4.64% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 4.50% | 0.33% | 4.17% |
| FDXFedex Corp. | 4.25% | 0.28% | 3.97% |
| CHRWCh Robinson Worldwide Inc. | 2.95% | 0.09% | 2.86% |
| FDXFFedex Freight Holding Company Inc | 2.61% | 0.07% | 2.54% |
| LSTRLandstar System Inc | 0.99% | 0.03% | 0.96% |
25.1% of SUPL is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SUPL or VYM?
SUPL has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SUPL or VYM?
Over the past year SUPL returned +25.19% vs +17.82% for VYM, so SUPL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SUPL annualized +5.80% vs +11.58% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SUPL or VYM?
SUPL has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SUPL -24.4% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both SUPL and VYM?
SUPL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SUPL and VYM?
25.1% of SUPL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.8% of VYM's is in holdings SUPL also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in SUPL and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SUPL or VYM?
SUPL yields 2.51% while VYM yields 2.22%, so SUPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SUPL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SUPL led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.