IVV vs TGRZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs China AI Tigers LLM ETF
Which is better, IVV or TGRZ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TGRZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.86% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 1 |
| YTD Return | +10.99%Best | -54.66% |
| 1Y Return | +11.30% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.62% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.79% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | EMQQ ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 25, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs TGRZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TGRZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and China AI Tigers LLM ETF (TGRZ) is an ETF from EMQQ ETF. Year to date, IVV is up 10.99% versus a loss of 54.66% for TGRZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TGRZ charges 0.86%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $86 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for TGRZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 506 holdings in IVV and 1 in TGRZ, totalling 99.9% and 35.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in TGRZ, against full books of 508 and 1.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TGRZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TGRZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TGRZ charges 0.86%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TGRZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while TGRZ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TGRZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.