IVV vs TINY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Proshares Nanotechnology ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TINY delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TINY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.19% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 31 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +48.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +80.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +30.36% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 33.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -43.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 26, 2021 |
IVV vs TINY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Proshares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while TINY returned +80.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 48.25% for TINY.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +30.36% for TINY. Across the full 5-year window we track, TINY has the edge at +16.63% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TINY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -43.8% for TINY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TINY charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.19% for TINY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TINY share 3 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TINY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TINY charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TINY?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +80.36% for TINY, so TINY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +16.63% for TINY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TINY?
TINY has been the more volatile fund at 33.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TINY -43.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TINY?
IVV and TINY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TINY?
IVV and TINY share 3 common holdings with a 4.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TINY?
IVV yields 1.10% while TINY yields 0.19%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.