IVV vs TLCI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Touchstone International Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or TLCI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TLCI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.37% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $113M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.56% |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +2.01% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +3.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -12.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $13,190Best | $10,660 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 40.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Touchstone Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 3, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 5, 2025 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.5 years).
IVV vs TLCI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TLCI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while TLCI returned +3.06%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 2.01% for TLCI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.1% compared with 11.9% for TLCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for IVV and -12.2% for TLCI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TLCI charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $37 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.56% for TLCI.
Holdings Overlap
0.6% of IVV's money is in holdings TLCI also owns. 10.3% of TLCI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
TLCI and IVV share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in TLCI, against full books of 508 and 34.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for TLCI that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.4% of the fund), and 492 for IVV that do not appear in TLCI (98.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TLCI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TLCI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TLCI charges 0.37%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TLCI?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +3.06% for TLCI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +20.27% vs +4.35% for TLCI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TLCI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.1% annualized versus 11.9% for TLCI. Worst drawdown: IVV -14.6% vs TLCI -12.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TLCI?
IVV and TLCI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TLCI?
10.3% of TLCI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 10.3% of TLCI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in TLCI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TLCI?
IVV yields 1.06% while TLCI yields 0.56%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TLCI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.