IVV vs TMFS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or TMFS?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TMFS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 35 |
| YTD Return | +13.86%Best | +0.88% |
| 1Y Return | +21.57%Best | -1.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.48%Best | +6.85% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | -2.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 23.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -48.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $8,663 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 30, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 30, 2018 to Sep 3, 2026 (7.8 years).
IVV vs TMFS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TMFS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) is an ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% while TMFS returned -1.24%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.86% versus a gain of 0.88% for TMFS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.48% per year against +6.85% for TMFS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and -2.83% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.56% annualized vs +8.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 16.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -48.8% for TMFS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TMFS charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for TMFS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 33 in TMFS, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 33 in TMFS, against full books of 508 and 35.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 33 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 497 positions TMFS does not, 99.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TMFS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TMFS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TMFS charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TMFS?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% vs -1.24% for TMFS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +15.56% vs +8.43% for TMFS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TMFS?
TMFS has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 16.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs TMFS -48.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TMFS?
IVV and TMFS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TMFS?
IVV yields 1.10% while TMFS yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TMFS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.