IVV vs UFO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Procure Space ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. UFO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UFO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.94% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $633M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.34% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +20.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +58.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +38.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +12.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 32.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -50.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Procure ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 10, 2019 |
IVV vs UFO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Procure Space ETF (UFO) is a ETF from Procure ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while UFO returned +58.60%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 20.39% for UFO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +38.13% for UFO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +12.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, UFO has the edge at +10.62% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -50.3% for UFO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UFO charges 0.94%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $94 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.34% for UFO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and UFO share 10 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UFO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UFO charges 0.94%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or UFO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +58.60% for UFO, so UFO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +10.62% for UFO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or UFO?
UFO has been the more volatile fund at 32.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UFO -50.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and UFO?
IVV and UFO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UFO?
IVV and UFO share 10 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UFO?
IVV yields 1.10% while UFO yields 0.34%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.