IVV vs URNM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | URNM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $1.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.32% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 26 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -9.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +20.54% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +19.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +18.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 45.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -50.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Sprott ETFS | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 3, 2019 |
IVV vs URNM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while URNM returned +20.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 9.89% for URNM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +19.12% for URNM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +18.25% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, URNM has the edge at +27.92% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URNM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -50.8% for URNM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while URNM charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.32% for URNM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and URNM share 0 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or URNM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while URNM charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or URNM?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +20.54% for URNM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +27.92% for URNM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or URNM?
URNM has been the more volatile fund at 45.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs URNM -50.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and URNM?
IVV and URNM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and URNM?
IVV and URNM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or URNM?
IVV yields 1.09% while URNM yields 3.32%, so URNM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.