URNM vs VYM

URNM vs VYM

Which is better, URNM or VYM?

Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. URNM led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricURNMVYM
Expense Ratio0.75%0.04%Best
AUM$2.2B$81.6B
Dividend Yield3.58%2.24%
Holdings27613
YTD Return-5.59%+14.82%Best
1Y Return+15.47%+20.84%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+15.72%+18.64%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.34%+12.28%Best
Volatility (annualized)45.8%15.6%Best
Max Drawdown-50.8%-35.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$17,110$17,845Best
Top 10 Weight78.2%25.9%Best
Fund FamilySprott ETFSVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 3, 2019Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.8 years).

URNM vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.

URNM vs VYM Performance

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URNM returned +15.47% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, URNM is down 5.59% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.

Over three years, URNM compounded at +15.72% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.34% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, URNM has the edge at +28.53% annualized vs +11.69%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

URNM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.8% compared with 15.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.8% for URNM and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

URNM charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URNM currently yields 3.58% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 25 holdings in URNM and 603 in VYM, totalling 99.4% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in URNM and 603 in VYM, against full books of 27 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 570 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for URNM (97.4% of the fund), and 4 for URNM that do not appear in VYM (12.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of URNM and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

URNMVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, URNM or VYM?

URNM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, URNM or VYM?

Over the past year URNM returned +15.47% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), URNM annualized +28.53% vs +11.69% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, URNM or VYM?

URNM has been the more volatile fund at 45.8% annualized versus 15.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: URNM -50.8% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both URNM and VYM?

URNM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, URNM or VYM?

URNM yields 3.58% while VYM yields 2.24%, so URNM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than URNM?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. URNM led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.