IVV vs USNG
IVV vs USNG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. USNG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | USNG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.43% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 28 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +22.36% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +32.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -11.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 20, 2025 |
IVV vs USNG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while USNG returned +32.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 22.36% for USNG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -11.9% for USNG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while USNG charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.43% for USNG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and USNG share 9 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in USNG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMB | 0.14% | 8.45% | 8.31% |
| KMI | 0.10% | 7.34% | 7.24% |
| TRGP | 0.09% | 3.92% | 3.83% |
| VST | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PPL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| APD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| OKE | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| EQT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CHK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 9 holdings IVV shares with USNG Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or USNG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while USNG charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or USNG?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +32.16% for USNG, so USNG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +30.60% for USNG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or USNG?
USNG has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs USNG -11.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and USNG?
IVV and USNG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and USNG?
IVV and USNG share 9 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or USNG?
IVV yields 1.09% while USNG yields 1.43%, so USNG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.