IVV vs USNG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
Which is better, IVV or USNG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. USNG led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | USNG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.52% |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +27.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +31.18%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 16.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -11.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $12,995 | $14,347Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 62.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 20, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.3 years).
IVV vs USNG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs USNG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while USNG returned +31.18%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 27.98% for USNG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -11.9% for USNG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while USNG charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.52% for USNG.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of IVV's money is in holdings USNG also owns. 26.2% of USNG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
USNG and IVV share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in USNG, against full books of 508 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 15 positions for USNG that do not appear in our book for IVV (61.4% of the fund), and 474 for IVV that do not appear in USNG (98.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in USNG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.14% | 8.73% | 8.59% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 0.10% | 7.48% | 7.38% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 0.10% | 4.17% | 4.07% |
| PPLPpl Corp (Utilities) | 0.04% | 1.91% | 1.87% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 0.10% | 1.62% | 1.52% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.09% | 0.89% | 0.80% |
| EQTEQT Corp. | 0.05% | 0.86% | 0.81% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corp | 0.04% | 0.51% | 0.47% |
26.2% of USNG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or USNG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while USNG charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or USNG?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +31.18% for USNG, so USNG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +22.33% vs +32.00% for USNG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or USNG?
USNG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs USNG -11.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and USNG?
IVV and USNG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and USNG?
26.2% of USNG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 26.2% of USNG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in USNG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or USNG?
IVV yields 1.06% while USNG yields 1.52%, so USNG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USNG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. USNG led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.