IVV vs WEPN

IVV vs WEPN

Which is better, IVV or WEPN?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVWEPN
Expense Ratio0.03%Best1.11%
AUM$876.4B$7M
Dividend Yield1.06%5.97%
Holdings50887
YTD Return+11.57%Best-8.50%
1Y Return+17.57%-
3Y Return (annualized)+20.71%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.80%-
Top 10 Weight37.9%Best57.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)XFunds
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 3, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs WEPN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs WEPN Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nicholas Defense and Rare Earth Income ETF (WEPN) is an ETF from XFunds. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a loss of 8.50% for WEPN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while WEPN charges 1.11%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $111 annually, a gap of $108 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.97% for WEPN.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in WEPN2.2%
WEPN already in IVV41.6%

2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings WEPN also owns. 41.6% of WEPN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in WEPN, against full books of 508 and 87.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 18 positions for WEPN that do not appear in our book for IVV (55.0% of the fund), and 486 for IVV that do not appear in WEPN (97.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in WEPNDifference
PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc.0.44%9.56%9.12%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A0.32%8.14%7.82%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc0.55%4.99%4.44%
RTXRtx Corp.0.45%4.05%3.60%
AXONAxon Enterprise Inc0.07%4.28%4.21%
LMTLockheed Martin Corp0.18%3.41%3.23%
NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp.0.11%2.94%2.83%
HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc.0.02%2.67%2.65%
ALBAlbemarle Corp.0.02%1.58%1.56%

41.6% of WEPN is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVWEPN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or WEPN?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WEPN charges 1.11%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $108 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WEPN?

41.6% of WEPN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 41.6% of WEPN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in WEPN.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WEPN?

IVV yields 1.06% while WEPN yields 5.97%, so WEPN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WEPN better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.