JRE vs VTI
Janus Henderson US Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. JRE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JRE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.65% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.13% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.54% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.02% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.94% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Janus Henderson Investors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
JRE vs VTI Performance
Janus Henderson US Real Estate ETF (JRE) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JRE returned +23.54% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, JRE is up 20.13% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, JRE compounded at +11.02% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.94% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JRE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for JRE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JRE charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JRE currently yields 4.65% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JRE and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JRE or VTI?
JRE has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JRE or VTI?
Over the past year JRE returned +23.54% vs +22.43% for VTI, so JRE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), JRE annualized +5.11% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JRE or VTI?
JRE has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: JRE -31.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JRE and VTI?
JRE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JRE and VTI?
JRE and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JRE or VTI?
JRE yields 4.65% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JRE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.