JULB vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: TiedMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJULBVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.25%0.03%
AUM$45M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.07%
Holdings53,543
YTD Return+10.19%+14.82%
1Y Return-+22.43%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.34%
Volatility (annualized)-15.4%
Max Drawdown-5.2%-56.6%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionOct 13, 2025May 24, 2001

JULB vs VTI Performance

Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) is a ETF from Aptus ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JULB is up 10.19% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.2% for JULB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JULB charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JULB currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JULB or VTI?

JULB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.

Which pays a higher dividend, JULB or VTI?

JULB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.