JULZ vs SPY
TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JULZ | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $36M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.65% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +10.45% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.12% | +23.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.67% | +21.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.38% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2020 | Jan 22, 1993 |
JULZ vs SPY Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year JULZ returned +5.12% while SPY returned +23.66%. Year to date, JULZ is up 10.45% versus a gain of 13.79% for SPY.
Over three years, JULZ compounded at +11.67% per year against +21.40% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +8.38% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, JULZ has the edge at +11.90% annualized vs +8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.5% for JULZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for JULZ and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JULZ charges 0.79% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $9 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JULZ currently yields 5.65% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
JULZ and SPY share 0 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JULZ or SPY?
JULZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JULZ or SPY?
Over the past year JULZ returned +5.12% vs +23.66% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), JULZ annualized +11.90% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JULZ or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.5% for JULZ. Worst drawdown: JULZ -17.4% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both JULZ and SPY?
JULZ and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between JULZ and SPY?
JULZ and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JULZ or SPY?
JULZ yields 5.65% while SPY yields 1.01%, so JULZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.