KBA vs SPY
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. KBA delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBA | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $148M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +5.26% | +12.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.63% | +20.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.48% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.87% | +12.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2014 | Jan 22, 1993 |
KBA vs SPY Performance
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) is a ETF from KraneShares and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year KBA returned +23.63% while SPY returned +20.83%. Year to date, KBA is up 5.26% versus a gain of 12.22% for SPY.
Over three years, KBA compounded at +15.48% per year against +21.70% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are -0.87% and +12.98% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.79% annualized vs +5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KBA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for KBA and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBA charges 0.56% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $9 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBA currently yields 1.46% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
KBA and SPY share 0 holdings out of 554 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBA or SPY?
KBA has an expense ratio of 0.56% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KBA or SPY?
Over the past year KBA returned +23.63% vs +20.83% for SPY, so KBA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), KBA annualized +5.91% vs +8.79% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KBA or SPY?
KBA has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: KBA -56.5% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both KBA and SPY?
KBA and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KBA and SPY?
KBA and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 554 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBA or SPY?
KBA yields 1.46% while SPY yields 1.01%, so KBA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.