KBA vs VYM
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. KBA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $148M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +7.43% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.78% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.30% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.70% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2014 | Nov 10, 2006 |
KBA vs VYM Performance
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBA returned +27.78% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, KBA is up 7.43% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, KBA compounded at +16.30% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.70% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KBA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for KBA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBA charges 0.56% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $4 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBA currently yields 1.46% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
KBA and VYM share 0 holdings out of 653 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBA or VYM?
KBA has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KBA or VYM?
Over the past year KBA returned +27.78% vs +23.85% for VYM, so KBA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), KBA annualized +6.08% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KBA or VYM?
KBA has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: KBA -56.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both KBA and VYM?
KBA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KBA and VYM?
KBA and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 653 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBA or VYM?
KBA yields 1.46% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.