KBA vs VOO
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KBA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $148M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.26% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.34% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KBA vs VOO Performance
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBA returned +28.26% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, KBA is up 6.35% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, KBA compounded at +15.16% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -1.34% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KBA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for KBA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBA charges 0.56% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBA currently yields 1.46% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KBA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBA or VOO?
KBA has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KBA or VOO?
Over the past year KBA returned +28.26% vs +21.79% for VOO, so KBA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), KBA annualized +6.00% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KBA or VOO?
KBA has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KBA -56.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KBA and VOO?
KBA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KBA and VOO?
KBA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBA or VOO?
KBA yields 1.46% while VOO yields 1.08%, so KBA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.